CCIA supports New Hampshire House amendments on AI bill

CCIA supports New Hampshire House amendments on AI bill

Technology
Webp tcnbirtuzk985chjqbpm50haef98
Matthew Schruers President & CEO at Computer & Communications Industry Association | Official website

LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Have a concern or an opinion about this story? Click below to share your thoughts.
Send a message

Community Newsmaker

Know of a story that needs to be covered? Pitch your story to The Business Daily.
Community Newsmaker

The Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA) is set to testify before the New Hampshire House Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety regarding Senate Bill 263. The association has expressed its support for the amendments proposed by the House, which it views as a significant improvement over the original draft and earlier Senate amendments.

Senate Bill 263, as initially drafted, could have imposed substantial liability on businesses offering generative AI tools, customer service bots, and other automated technologies due to vague standards. The broad language of the original bill might have led services to either excessively censor communications or entirely restrict access for minors, potentially hindering innovation and free expression online.

The House's amendments introduce several important changes. These include limiting enforcement authority to the New Hampshire Attorney General, providing a 90-day period for good faith compliance efforts, and refining what constitutes "endangering the welfare of a child." These modifications aim to make the bill more enforceable while reducing the risk of overreach. CCIA advocates for stronger online protections for minors through clear and narrowly tailored policies rather than vague prohibitions.

Kyle Sepe, State Policy Manager for CCIA, stated: “We appreciate the House Committee’s thoughtful approach to improving SB 263. The amended version takes meaningful steps to limit the scope of the bill and provide clearer standards for compliance. While more work remains to be done on the bill, particularly in defining key terms and narrowing overly broad applications, we thank House members for their efforts to make this legislation more workable and less likely to harm legitimate online services.”

LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Have a concern or an opinion about this story? Click below to share your thoughts.
Send a message

Community Newsmaker

Know of a story that needs to be covered? Pitch your story to The Business Daily.
Community Newsmaker

MORE NEWS